Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dundee council weighs water options: pipeline cost, Newberg partnership and public process
Summary
Councilors directed the water work group to compare two long-term water supply options — a pipeline from McMinnville and partnership with Newberg — including cost estimates, timelines and trade-offs, and to return recommendations for public open houses and council discussion.
DUNDEE — At a council work session addressing priorities for the coming year, members focused on long-term water supply choices and asked staff and the water working group to produce a side-by-side analysis of options, costs and community impacts.
The council heard that one option — building new pipe into the Riverside District — is costly but provides near-term supply. "We need roughly $29 to build the pipe," said Speaker 3, summarizing an engineering estimate discussed in the meeting. Council members also discussed a Newberg partnership that could require a multi-million-dollar contribution; Speaker 3 said Newberg’s plan might require the council to contribute "$5.06, $7,000,000" toward the regional effort while seeking grant support that could take years to deliver.
Speaker 2 asked the water working group to document the pros and cons of bringing pipe in from the Lafayette intersection versus routing from Newberg, estimate timelines and costs, and return a written recommendation the council can use in conversations with Newberg and McMinnville. The council also discussed grant opportunities and the possibility that pipeline segments could be funded by outside grants, but members emphasized that grant timelines can be long and would not necessarily secure near-term capacity.
Council members agreed to a two-step outreach plan: 1) the water working group should complete technical and financial comparisons and present results to the council in a work session; 2) the council will invite each regional provider (Newberg, McMinnville and others) to present details to the council and then hold a public open house to explain options, costs, timelines and implications for residents.
The session produced no formal decision but set a clear direction for the water team to provide quantified options and a public engagement schedule. The council said it intends to accelerate discussions so the city can give a clear response to regional partners and incorporate findings into planning for the new city administrator.
