Board debates custodial performance and whether to solicit bids for janitorial, food and transportation services
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
Board members expressed frustration with custodial performance at Central School, discussed checklists and accountability, and several members urged an RFP to compare in‑house services vs. contracting out for janitorial, transportation and food service.
Board members debated custodial performance, accountability and the possibility of soliciting bids for several district services.
Several trustees said Central School custodial performance has declined. One board member stated bluntly, "they're refusing to do the job," and called for accountability and, if necessary, replacement. District staff and principals responded that custodial leads have been given checklists, principals have been notified and weekly meetings are in place; staff said a formal write‑up process had not yet been pursued.
Board discussion included operational details: Central was said to have about 10 custodians while the high school has six to seven, prompting questions about workload and coverage. Some trustees cautioned against blanket criticism of all custodians and urged recognition of staff who work hard. Others recommended seeking bids to compare in‑house costs with contracted services for janitorial, transportation and food service, arguing that an RFP and cost comparison could inform decisions even if the board ultimately keeps services in‑house.
Members asked the superintendent’s office or procurement staff to draft an RFP; one trustee named Mr. Reeves as the drafter. Several board members said they would meet individually to review proposed changes before bringing recommendations back to the full board.
Next steps: staff to prepare an RFP draft and provide cost comparisons; board members to meet individually with staff to discuss RFP scope and any potential transitions.