Federal tax bill’s cuts concentrate at top, ITEP researcher tells committee

Summary

Carl Davis of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy told a legislative committee that HR1’s tax cuts are regressive, concentrate benefits at the top of the income scale and pose state-level risks if Vermont conformsto selected provisions; he urged targeted review and modeling by JFO before any conformity decision.

Carl Davis, research director with the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, told a legislative committee that the federal tax bill known as HR1 produces large benefits for higher-income families and creates questions for Vermont about whether to “conform” to those federal changes.

Davis said the bill reduces rates, adjusts brackets, expands the standard deduction and the child tax credit, and includes large business tax breaks, particularly accelerated depreciation. “And just to emphasize, around half of the tax cuts in this federal bill are flowing to the top,” Davis said, describing a distributional pattern that he called a “regressive tilt.”

The nut graf: Davis urged lawmakers to treat conformity choices selectively. He said some federal provisions—especially those aimed at business investment and new carve-outs for early-stage investors—translate poorly to Vermont policy, which relies on single-sales-factor…

Federal tax bill’s cuts concentrate at top, ITEP researcher tells committee

Summary

Subscribe to keep reading