Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Photography topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Quakertown committee hears competing photography proposals, defers contract decision to gather yearbook input
Summary
The Student Activities and Athletics Committee heard hourlong pitches from two school-photography vendors — representatives of "Katy/Cady" and Christmas City Studio — and agreed to invite the yearbook adviser for a preview before forwarding any contract to the full board. Parents raised concerns about pricing and prior vendor glitches.
The Quakertown Community School District’s Student Activities and Athletics Committee heard presentations Jan. 14 from two school‑photography vendors and agreed to collect more information from the yearbook adviser before recommending a contract to the full school board.
Committee members heard back‑to‑back presentations from a team led by Jeremy Cady, who described a fully digital senior‑portrait and underclass process that uses a QR opt‑in and promises uploaded images within 48 hours, and from Christmas City Studio owners Rob and Matt Newman, who emphasized local service, SOC 2 compliance and a long history of district partnerships.
The debate centered on cost, workflow and reliability. "We believe that we should be the portrait company and the school should be the educator," Jeremy Cady said while outlining his company’s digital workflow and customer service model. Christmas City’s Matt Newman presented a conservative pricing comparison and said, "I would estimate we could return about $16,000 or more to your families on an annual basis," citing assumed participation and prepay rates.
Committee members pressed both firms on specific operational concerns: whether athletic media days would disrupt existing booster‑led practices, how off‑site teams (for swimming or golf) would be handled, turnaround times for proofs and ID cards, and how vendors reconcile scheduled students versus photographed students so no students are omitted from the yearbook.
Several board members and administrators noted the district’s first year with the current vendor (referred to in the meeting as Katie/Katy) means the committee has not yet seen a complete product cycle. In light of that, the committee asked the yearbook adviser to meet with the group or to appear before the full board to provide firsthand insight into timeliness and image consistency before a final vote.
Members also heard public comment citing family costs. Parent Tracy Moyer said she paid "almost double" for her daughter’s senior portraits after the switch to the current vendor and asked the board to consider Quakertown household demographics when weighing vendor proposals.
The committee recorded no final vendor selection; members said they would review the vendors’ PDFs and video presentations, invite the yearbook adviser for a preview, and then forward a recommendation to the full board for solicitor review and final action.
