Farmers Branch parks board previews Squire Park alternatives, confirms additional Mercer funding

Farmers Branch Parks & Recreation Board · January 16, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Parks & Recreation Board heard project updates showing Squire Park design at 40% and the Mercer Park design expanded after a $1 million boost; staff said Squire will return to the board in February with alternative design options and invited public feedback before finalizing plans.

The Farmers Branch Parks & Recreation Board heard progress updates on several capital park projects and funding at its most recent meeting. Staff reported Squire Park is about 40% through design and will come back to the board in February with alternative options for review; the board was asked to provide feedback before design completion.

Staff also said Mercer Park recently received an additional $1,000,000 from the council’s year-end fund balance to expand design work to the south portion, allowing a full north-and-south concept. Staff described the additional Squire Park allocation as $300,000, bringing Squire’s budget to roughly $1.3 million; Mercer’s total was described as about $2.1 million. Staff characterized those budget figures as approximate and said they will provide final accounting later.

Dutch Village’s grand reopening was moved to March 17, with a morning ribbon-style celebration planned. Board members asked staff to include public outreach and sign-off steps in the February packet so members and residents can review alternatives before a design recommendation.

Board members emphasized balancing water use and tree canopy in new designs. One member noted recent city-wide water-conservation messaging and urged designers to consider “trees and water” optics when evaluating features such as fountains or water elements.

Votes at a glance: the board approved the meeting minutes by motion (mover: Jan Wooldridge; second: David Jones) and later adjourned by motion; both procedural items passed with the board voting "Aye."