Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Economic Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CRA members flag formula-business language, ask CRB to craft clearer guidance
Summary
Board members raised concerns that the CRA's existing formula-business criteria are overly broad and difficult for staff to apply; the board directed staff/CRB to draft clearer, objective examples and return with recommendations.
Board members at the Stuart CRA debated how to treat "formula" or chain businesses in the downtown CRA and directed staff and the Cultural Review Board (CRB) to revisit the language and propose clearer guidance.
Board member Brechtel said the current standards leave too much discretion and could lead to arbitrary outcomes: "I think we need legal counsel... to take a look at it. I think we need to have something more definitive... to give guidance to staff as to what would qualify and what wouldn't qualify because it's...it puts everybody in a really tough spot." He and others noted the 300-foot designation in the ordinance provides a defensible boundary but does not capture all cases that may affect downtown character.
Commissioner Reid and other members suggested offering concrete examples of disallowed or discouraged features (for example, whether multiple downtown locations of the same chain should be treated differently) to make staff decisions more defensible. Several commissioners agreed to send the topic back to CRB and to include it on a future CRA agenda, with legal counsel available to assist in drafting clarifying language.
No formal vote was taken; the board provided direction to staff and the CRB to return with language and examples that would reduce discretion and help staff make consistent determinations.
