Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs subsidizing $1 Bluegrass Scribe fare and considers a temporary insurance tax cut
Summary
Council discussed whether to subsidize a newly restored $1 fare on Bluegrass Scribe service (staff said a $60,000 annual gap to eliminate the fare) and debated a proposal to reduce the local 8% insurance premium tax by 1 percentage point using surplus revenue; staff were asked to model costs and impacts before action.
Get email alerts on the Budget Transit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Councilmembers on Jan. 12 discussed two budgetary items raised under new business: whether the city should subsidize a reinstated $1 fare on the Bluegrass Scribe transportation service, and a proposal to use a year-end surplus to temporarily lower the local insurance premium tax rate.
Bluegrass Community Action (Bluegrass Scribe) resumed charging $1 per ride after a five-year pause. Staff reported ridership growth to roughly 4,000 monthly riders and said the agency estimates a roughly $60,000 annual funding gap to eliminate the $1 fare. Councilmembers recommended reaching out to Bluegrass Scribe to confirm costs and exploring whether the county or other partners could share the subsidy; staff said the nonprofit is open to eliminating the fee if local funds are provided.
Council also debated a proposal to reduce the city’s insurance premium tax from 8% to 7% (with some members proposing 6% or adding a sunset clause). Proponents said returning funds to residents would be broadly distributed because many people pay some form of insurance; opponents and finance-minded members urged caution, noting net profits can fluctuate and recommended using one-time excess funds for capital projects. Council asked finance staff to model the fiscal impact, consider triggers or a sunset clause, and return with analysis ahead of state notice deadlines (staff noted a March 23 notice timeline for ordinance changes affecting the next fiscal year). No vote was taken on either subsidy or tax-change ordinance at the Jan. 12 meeting.

