Scottsdale commission recommends renewal of marijuana dispensary CUP and removal of five-year review condition

Scottsdale Planning Commission · January 15, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission recommended approval of a renewal of an existing conditional-use permit for a marijuana dispensary (case 9UP-2015-4), including removal of a five-year timing stipulation; the motion passed on a roll-call vote with one commissioner recorded as opposed.

The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of a conditional-use-permit renewal for an existing marijuana dispensary (case 9UP-2015-4) and to remove the five-year timing stipulation that required periodic reapplication.

Brian Clough, Planning Department, said the request is a standard CUP renewal and includes a full staff review—police review of any public-safety plan is part of the packet. Clough explained the timing stipulation was originally added in 2011 as a temporary measure while the use was new; the applicant asked to eliminate that recurring five-year review because, staff said, the operations have been comparable to other office/medical uses and there have not been reported negative impacts.

A motion to recommend approval was seconded and a roll-call vote was conducted; the transcript records: Chair Scarborough yes; Vice Chair Young yes; Commissioner Gonzales no; Commissioner O'Toole yes; Commissioner Joiner yes; Commissioner Drake yes; Commissioner Reid yes. The motion passed and will be forwarded to City Council with the commission's recommendation.

Why it matters

Removing the five-year timing stipulation would change the permit from a periodic-review format to a standard CUP that remains in effect unless conditions change or the city initiates revocation procedures. City staff emphasized that renewals include a full staff and police review.

What happens next

The recommendation goes to City Council for final action; staff will ensure any applicable public-safety conditions are enforced through standard review and revocation provisions in the zoning code.

Provenance

Staff presentation and Q&A: SEG 321'SEG 381. Motion and roll-call vote: SEG 439'SEG 467.