Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Assessor defends $9.4 million valuation for Pape Machinery property at Franklin County BOE

Franklin County Board of Equalization · January 16, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The assessor’s appraisal for a service/repair garage and associated buildings (Pape Machinery/John Deere dealer) totaling ~33,680 sq ft was presented and defended; county appraiser said cost‑and‑sales calibration supports the $9,396,800 assessed amount.

The Franklin County assessor’s office presented evidence supporting a $9,396,800 assessed value for a commercial property occupied by a John Deere dealer (identified in the record as Pape Machinery) during petition BE2025‑53. Appraiser Shannon Taylor told the Board of Equalization the site consists of multiple 2018 buildings totaling about 33,680 square feet on roughly 2.6 acres in Neighborhood 500 and that the assessor used a cost approach calibrated to time‑adjusted sales to test market reasonableness.

Taylor said the assessor extracted land value and compared time‑adjusted per‑square‑foot sales (about $2.87/sq. ft. after adjustments) to the cost model and permitting information; the assessor’s analysis indicated the model and sales generally bracket the assessed improvement and land values. Taylor also noted that the assessor breaks out building components (service repair area, showroom/sales area, offices, storage) in the statistical model rather than treating all automotive‑type buildings identically.

During board questions, members asked how the assessor differentiates showroom area from service portions of the building when applying Marshall & Swift cost guidelines and how weighting among similar building types is applied in the mass‑appraisal process. Taylor described the process of grouping similar building types and applying separate analyses where appropriate. The hearing concluded; the board will issue a written decision within the next four weeks and the appellant retains appeal rights.