Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee postpones action on amendment to Aiea senior-housing lease after members seek more data
Summary
The Zoning and Planning Committee postponed consideration of a city-requested amendment to the ground lease and development agreement for a 139-unit senior affordable project at the former Aiea Sugar Mill site after council members asked for more time to assess lease-up, outreach and protections for residents 62 and older.
The Honolulu City Council Committee on Zoning and Planning on Jan. 15 postponed action on a proposed amendment that would lower the minimum age for a senior affordable rental project at the former Aiea Sugar Mill site from 62 to 55.
Kevin Auger, director of the Department of Housing and Land Management, told the committee the amendment would change only the project’s minimum age requirement and would not alter affordability levels, rents, unit mix or the city’s lease oversight. “DHLM respectfully recommends approval of the resolution,” Auger said.
EAH Housing project manager Questor Lau said the development received a certificate of occupancy on Aug. 13, 2025, and that the project currently has vacancies. “It’s important that we achieve a 100% occupancy for this project,” Lau said, describing outreach and lease-up efforts.
Council members pressed the developer and the administration for more information about leasing, marketing and whether the city could preserve priority for older seniors. Council member Cordero asked what other eligibility changes had been considered and urged more community outreach; Council member Tupelo raised management and lease-term issues as possible barriers to senior applicants; Council member Okimoto said her office continues to receive constituent complaints about long permit and process times and asked how the council could help resolve sticking points.
EAH and DHLM said they have offered move-in incentives, reduced deposits and free rent for early lease-ups and that they maintain a wait list of applicants 55 and older. Marian Gushikin of EAH’s team said the project’s compliance staff believed program rules tied to federal policy allow either a 62+ or 55+ senior designation and that a preference for 62+ households could be considered but is not the same as a firm eligibility threshold.
Given questions about outreach, the short time the project has been leasing and requests for additional data, the chair recommended and the committee agreed to postpone action until the committee’s next session (noted on the agenda as 02/05/2025 at 9 a.m. in the hearing record). The committee asked the administration and developer to provide further documentation on marketing, lease-up outreach, the makeup of the current occupants and any possible preference mechanisms for older seniors.
Next steps: The committee will take the item up at the postponed hearing and the administration will supply the requested lease-up and outreach details before that meeting.
