Campton Hills authorizes HR services contract amid debate over agenda timing and budgets

The Campton Hills board voted to authorize a contract with HR2U (Kathy Lamkin) to provide human-resources services after extended discussion about agenda procedure and budget authority.

Therese objected to the item being placed on the agenda, citing a seven-day advance rule in the village code; she asked that procedural issues about who may add or remove items from the agenda be addressed. "It was placed on the agenda and, by I believe our administrator, and then our president rightfully removed it," she said, arguing the seven-day rule had not been satisfied. Other trustees responded that the board had previously directed staff in closed session to move the item forward and that the administrator also has authority to place items on the agenda.

Trustees debated whether hiring HR consulting hours required a specific budget line or a formal budget amendment. Carmen said the engagement could be covered under the village's general administrative line if available; supporters noted the consultant's expected hourly rate ($110) is significantly lower than outside counsel hourly rates and would reduce reliance on higher-cost legal counsel for HR matters.

Several trustees voiced support for keeping dedicated HR expertise available to reduce future legal expenses and improve personnel practices. Trustee Nick said bringing in a specialist could lower costs and provide day‑to‑day HR guidance.

The resolution (listed as Resolution 26-0101 on the agenda) passed on a roll-call vote: Benetti, Boatner and Burson voting aye; Hassenberger and Muir voting nay. Board members directed staff to refine contract language and return with a professional-services agreement and scope of services for final approval.