Board presses staff for clear plan as Innovations closure transition work continues
Loading...
Summary
District staff outlined individualized transition steps for 52 students affected by the closure of Innovations and a more developed plan for Nibley Park students; several board members pushed for a project manager and questioned whether staff would follow a prior motion to create a program equivalent in a comprehensive high school.
District staff and board members spent extensive time on Jan. 20 discussing student transitions after the board's decision to close Innovations.
G5 administrator Brian (presenting alongside Director Connolly and counselors) said district staff began meeting with students within 48 hours of the closure decision and that counselors have met with all but one of the 52 affected students to discuss options and needs. Staff emphasized individualized "warm handoffs"—coordinated counselor‑to‑counselor contacts—and said Mindy Holmdahl, director of student services, will oversee counselor coordination and outreach.
Board members pressed for more structure. Board member Ashley Anderson said she was concerned the staff report did not clearly implement the board's December motion directing creation of a program equivalent to Innovations at a comprehensive high school. Anderson asked how board leadership will ensure fidelity to the board motion; board leadership replied they will raise the question in leadership meetings and follow up with staff.
Members repeatedly asked for a single point of oversight. Several board members asked whether the Innovations counselor could be retained partially or in full to act as a transition project manager; administrators said they view the recommendation as reasonable and will return with a proposal at the next meeting. Staff reiterated that registration and open‑enrollment timelines will be published (the memo noted an open‑enrollment deadline of Feb. 6), and that many transition events and dates will be finalized in February and March.
School staffing and teacher placement were also discussed. Logan Hall described the assignment‑load committee process for placing career‑status teachers who become unassigned after a closure; district staff said they expect to place the impacted teachers and to prioritize placements ahead of public postings where appropriate.
Board members emphasized monitoring: "I don't want anyone to fall through the cracks," one member said, asking staff to provide a one‑page checklist of transition events and a single owner who can verify tasks are completed. Administrators committed to returning with more detail and continued outreach to families.
