Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Business Permits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves three downtown business permits and a signage/landmark modification
Summary
The commission approved a body‑art studio use permit, a restaurant alcohol license, and a landmark/signage modification for a motorcycle shop; applicants and property owners discussed signage details and landmark notification. Votes were unanimous among those present (6 yes, 1 absent) for the first two items and the signage item passed with one abs
The Oroville Planning Commission approved three land‑use items after staff presentations and limited public comment.
Gilded Needle Body Art and Fine Jewelry (14440 Myers St., Suite B; APN 012092005) — Staff recommended approval of a use permit for a body‑art studio emphasizing body piercing and fine jewelry. Applicant Sierra Holder told commissioners she has pierced in Butte County and is "born and raised here in Oroville," and aims to offer biocompatible materials such as gold and titanium locally. Commissioner (speaker 2) moved to approve item 2; the motion passed with a recorded vote of "6 yeses, 1 absent." Holder said she hopes to open as soon as possible, likely by December.
Spicy Kitchen (2450 Orodam Boulevard East; APN 013170073) — Staff presented a Type 41 (on‑sale beer and wine) use permit for a relocating restaurant and recommended approval with conditions; staff noted the site sits in a corridor mixed‑use zone and that the area already contains many alcohol licenses. No public speakers opposed; commissioners praised the building’s re‑use and parking. Commissioner (speaker 10) moved to approve item 3; the motion passed, "6 yeses, 1 absent." The staff report lists required conditions and operating hours limited by state law (6 a.m. to 2 a.m.).
Syndicate Cycle signage (730 Montgomery St.) — Staff brought a creative sign and landmark modification permit because the property meets two local landmark criteria (historic character and special aesthetic qualities). Applicant Matthew described a 35‑square‑foot sign and said he rehabilitated the existing historic sign and will cooperate with staff on any required adjustments. Property owner Raquel Nolan expressed surprise that the building qualifies under landmark criteria and said she had not been notified; staff and commissioners acknowledged shortcomings in owner notification and committed to posting an updated landmark list on the city website and improving notice procedures. Commissioners moved to approve the signage/landmark modification and recorded the motion as passed with one absence.
Each of these items was approved with conditions of approval as noted in staff packets; details such as required findings, operating hours for alcohol sales, and landmark alteration permit fees are recorded in staff materials.
