Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Battle Ground board approves revised student-discipline policy after discussion on fairness and data review
Summary
The board voted 5-0 to approve revisions to student discipline policy 3241 that remove the word "equitable," replace some language with "each and every student," and emphasize fairness and data review for disproportionality. Citizens' comments on both sides preceded the vote.
The Battle Ground School Board on Oct. 27 voted unanimously to adopt revisions to Policy 3241 (student discipline) after staff presented a redlined updated draft and discussed the board's prior feedback.
Tamara, a district staff member who led the policy rewrite, told the board the changes reflect committee input from district administrators and principals who handle discipline day-to-day. "We leaned pretty heavily into our District's strategic plan," she said, and the proposal replaces terms such as "equitable" and "culturally responsive" with language that refers to "each and every student" and to "fairness," according to the version presented.
The nut graf: The update was crafted by a District Office Action Committee that reviewed discipline data and included three principals and assistant principals; staff said the changes aim to clarify legal obligations, standardize terms and ensure the district monitors disciplinary data by subgroup to detect any disproportionality.
During citizen comment before the vote, multiple speakers expressed sharply different views. Mary Mendoza Hansel, president of the Battleground Education Association, defended educators and warned against rhetoric that labels teachers as "indoctrinators." Other commenters, including speakers who identified as parents and community members, criticized state-mandated discipline changes and argued against treating students differently based on race or demographic data. One speaker asked the board to ensure the policy contains remedies when standards are violated.
Board members discussed how the district responds when state data show disproportionality. Director Shelley (last name not provided in transcript) said staff typically investigate why disparities appear and whether a student's special-education status or other factors explain patterns; she emphasized the district can adjust supports and clarifications rather than automatically changing individual punishments.
After limited further discussion, a board member moved to approve the revisions and the board recorded a 5-0 vote in favor. The meeting minutes show the motion "passes 5 to 0." The motion and record did not list a mover or seconder by name in the transcript.
Ending: The revised policy will be codified in BoardDocs; staff and the board said the district will continue reviewing discipline metrics and school-level data to identify and address any patterns of concern.
