Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Report Card topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kenston Local reports strong state ratings but flags new college‑career readiness measure for improvement

6440507 · October 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Kenston Local officials told the school board on Oct. 13 that the district earned a 4.5 overall rating ("exceeding expectations") on the Ohio report card, with five stars in achievement and areas to target in the newly graded college, career, workforce and military readiness component.

Kenston Local administrators presented the district's state report card and building-level priorities at the Oct. 13 board of education meeting, saying the district earned an overall 4.5 rating — described as "exceeding expectations" — while officials identified the new college, career, workforce and military readiness measure as an area for improvement.

The presentation summarized how Ohio now weights six components to produce the district star ratings: achievement (25%), progress (25%), gap closing (12.5%), early literacy (12.5%), graduation (12.5%) and the newly graded college/career/workforce/military readiness (12.5%). "We have a 4.5 rating, which is considered exceeding expectations for the state of Ohio," a district presenter said, and the district earned five stars in achievement and graduation but three stars in the new readiness component.

Why it matters: the report card is a statewide metric used to compare districts on a mix of academic outcomes and readiness measures. The new readiness component evaluates how well graduates are prepared for multiple postsecondary pathways; Kenston administrators said this component uses data from the prior graduating class and awards each student a single "readiness point" for reaching qualifying benchmarks.

District leaders said the report card shows consistent performance in achievement and graduation while exposing gaps to address in college/career readiness and some measured standards at building levels. "Some of the areas of focus that we'll be really looking into this year is our college credit plus enrollment, military enlistment, [and] industry credentials," a high‑school representative said, describing multiple pathways that can earn a student the single readiness point counted by the state.

Administrators listed 11 ways a senior can earn that readiness point, including an honors diploma, remediation‑free SAT/ACT scores, three or more AP exam credits, 12 or more college credit plus (CCP) credits, military enlistment, approved industry credentials or an OhioMeansJobs readiness seal. The district staff said not all relevant data were captured on the 2024 report card — for example, the presentation noted a reporting gap for AP/dual‑credit figures that might have reduced the rated score.

School principals from the district's buildings described building‑level priorities aligned to the district results. The middle school principal outlined goals that include data‑driven instructional leadership, a daily "no new instruction" (NNI) block used for reteach and intervention, strengthened Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) and student leadership through student council and surveys. Elementary and other building leaders said they are aligning curriculum and common assessments to tested state standards and auditing pacing guides to ensure instruction matches how standards are measured on state tests.

Officials also described progress metrics (including forthcoming value‑added data the district expects to receive within weeks) that will let staff examine growth student‑by‑student and better identify learners who did not demonstrate a year's growth.

District and building leaders repeatedly emphasized they view the state report card as one measure and said they will use additional internal data and the district profile to plan targeted curriculum and professional development changes. "We're not teaching to the test," one administrator said, "we're teaching to the standard," and added that the district is working on deeper questioning and depth‑of‑knowledge strategies rather than rote memorization.

Ending: Administrators said they will continue building‑level work this year — aligning curriculum k–12, targeting power standards in ELA and math, and expanding pathways that allow more students to earn readiness points — and will bring more detailed follow‑up to the board as data arrive.