Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline And Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Joliet Township board hears PTAC recommendations on phones, dress code and lifesaving medicines
Summary
The Joliet Township High School District 204 board reviewed Parent‑Teacher Advisory Committee recommendations to prohibit smart/AI glasses, adopt a bell‑to‑bell cell‑phone restriction in academic areas, allow undesignated EpiPens and inhalers under policy 7‑2‑70, and revise dress‑code language including headwear rules. The board directed staff to prepare separate agenda/action memos for final votes.
The Joliet Township High School District 204 Board of Education on Monday reviewed a package of recommendations from the district’s Parent‑Teacher Advisory Committee aimed at student safety, classroom focus and consistent discipline procedures.
Anna Carbine, a dean at Joliet West and a PTAC presenter, described a proposed electronics policy that would prohibit the use, possession or wearing of smart/AI glasses on district property and remove cell phones from academic areas during class time. “We want cell phones put away to eliminate those distractions, keep the students focused, hopefully improve grades, support mental health,” Carbine said. The committee recommended that phones be allowed only at lunch and in hallways, with medical and safety exceptions written into procedures.
The recommendations also include a change to policy 7‑2‑70 to permit undesignated EpiPens and albuterol inhalers that are not prescribed to a single student, and to develop implementing procedures in consultation with nurses and the district’s PPS coordinators to align with Illinois State Board of Education guidance. A PTAC member summarized the rationale: “Those two specifically undesignated because those are life saving.”
On dress code, the committee proposed clarifications to policy 7‑1‑60 (grading and promotion and related handbook language) and recommended allowing headwear in school as long as a student’s face remains visible to staff for identification. Chuck Rumpf, a dean at West Campus who helped lead the research, said district staff observed West Aurora’s policy in practice and “there was no conflict or power struggle… people went about their day.”
Board members and classroom teachers questioned how enforcement would work. Several trustees said the current PTAC recommended approach relies on teachers to issue initial warnings and documentation for leveled infractions; some board members argued that placing the bulk of enforcement on teachers could harm classroom relationships and recommended exploring alternate workflows or elevating repeat infractions to dean referral. The board directed administration to produce separate memos so members can take items (undesignated medicines, electronics, and attire) up individually at the next meeting and to return data about disciplinary outcomes tied to headwear.
The PTAC presenters said the electronics recommendation is intended to be implemented with standardized classroom resources — such as phone pouches or lockers — and with clear, district‑wide expectations rather than teacher‑by‑teacher discretion. Presenters emphasized exceptions for documented medical needs and for limited instructional uses.
The committee stressed that the cell‑phone and dress‑code proposals are recommendations: they are at the stage of awareness and administrative planning rather than final policy adoption. Board discussion centered on implementation logistics, potential bargaining implications for confiscation procedures and the need for clear communication to families before any formal change.
Next steps: administration will prepare separate agenda memos and draft procedures for the board’s consideration, and staff will provide a breakdown of past discipline data related to headwear before the next meeting.
