Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff proposes targeted zoning changes to make smaller lots and simpler design rules easier to develop
Summary
Lakeville planning staff and developers discussed proposed ordinance tweaks: reducing some garage-size minimums for townhomes, adjusting perimeter buffer/berm requirements, easing detached-townhome exterior-material mandates, and allowing smaller lots without a conditional-use process. Planning commissioners supported several proposals and asked to
Lakeville planning staff laid out a package of potential zoning adjustments that aim to reduce construction costs and simplify review for certain housing products, including: smaller permitted townhouse garage footprints, reduced required perimeter buffers in some locations, clarifications to baselot setbacks, reduced complexity for minimum lot-size rules, and options to relax some mandatory exterior-material rules for detached townhomes.
Staff said the changes stem from a builders’ meeting called by the mayor and from subsequent consultant analysis. Planning consultant Dan Licht summarized priorities and the history of the ordinance changes, noting that multiple small edits could increase buildable area and reduce per-unit costs while preserving design standards for street layout and neighborhood character.
On attached garages, developers argued that reducing the minimum garage area for some townhome types could save builders roughly $3,000–$6,000 per unit in construction costs; planning commissioners supported lowering one particular townhome minimum to a 20-foot interior width standard and asked staff to refine text. On perimeter buffers and berming, staff and council members discussed tradeoffs: buffers can reduce noise and provide screening but also consume buildable land, so commissioners requested more study to balance safety, noise mitigation and land efficiency.
On exterior materials for detached townhomes, builders pressed to give developers the option to use higher-quality siding products and design variety instead of requiring stone or brick on front elevations; staff and some councilmembers cautioned that the earlier brick/stone requirement was adopted after older siding products failed in some neighborhoods and that HOA-maintained developments benefited from the more durable materials over time. Both sides requested more information and outreach to existing HOAs on the potential impacts.
Staff also described an option to reduce the acreage threshold for planned-unit developments (PUDs) so that developers could use PUD tools on smaller parcels. That change drew less consensus; planning commissioners asked staff to wait and to follow any statewide policy changes before pursuing that particular amendment.
Outcome: The planning commission and council expressed general support for several lower-impact changes (garage-size minimums, clarification of baselot setbacks and selective code cleanup). Council asked staff to return draft ordinance text that preserves design quality (curved streets, lot frontage variation) and to do additional outreach to HOAs and builders before any final action. The council did not adopt ordinance changes at this meeting.
Why this matters: The changes aim to slightly reduce development costs and broaden market options for smaller single-family and townhouse products while preserving long-term neighborhood durability and design standards. Staff will return draft ordinance language and impact analyses for council consideration.
