Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Planning Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves design compliance certificate and front-yard setback variance for Madison Avenue property

5601448 · February 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved a certificate of design compliance for a new structure in the Highway Gateway Overlay District and granted a variance reducing the Madison Avenue front-yard setback from 15 feet to roughly 0.092 feet.

The Mankato City Council on Feb. 24 approved a certificate of design compliance for a proposed new structure in the Highway Gateway Overlay District and granted a variance to reduce the front-yard building setback on the Madison Avenue side from 15 feet to 0.092 feet.

City planning staff said the item had been reviewed previously in 2023 and a similar variance was requested in 2008; in prior reviews the council recommended approval based on lot topography. Staff noted the project has been revised from an earlier three-story mixed-use design to a two-story structure. The site plan now contains all required parking on-site rather than relying on shared parking on adjacent parcels. Staff also described landscape screening to shield the parking area from adjacent properties and a fence on the side that will block lights from neighboring properties.

A council member asked for clarification after looking at the images and memos, expressing confusion about whether the reduced setback extended to the sidewalk; staff clarified the reduced setback applies to the property line and that a significant setback remains on the Bridal Street side.

Council member Hatampa moved approval of both the certificate of design compliance and the variance; Council member Lavin seconded. The council approved both items by roll call; all members voted yes.

Staff said the applicant will meet landscaping and screening requirements and that site-specific topography drove the need for flexibility from the code to accommodate a properly designed building on the lot.