Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Performance Clerk topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs HR to draft performance‑improvement plan for city clerk after extended debate
Summary
Following public comment and hours of council discussion, Crestview’s City Council voted to have human resources craft a targeted performance‑improvement plan (PIP) for the city clerk addressing public-records handling, leadership and communication training and related process clarifications, then return the draft for council review.
After extended council debate and public comment, the Crestview City Council on June 9 voted to ask the city’s human resources staff to draft a performance‑improvement plan (PIP) for the city clerk that would be returned to the council for approval.
Background and concerns: The item was prompted by earlier written reviews and council member comments that raised issues including the handling of public‑records requests, internal communication and coordination with council members, and instances where council members felt the clerk’s office had not accepted feedback. Several council members said they had received limited evidence beyond a small number of incidents and asked for a measured, fact‑based approach. Council members expressed differing views on whether corrective action was necessary: some said problems were limited and remediable with training and process changes, while others said patterns in prior reviews warranted formal action.
Vote and instructions to HR: The council first debated whether to proceed; after multiple rounds of discussion the council voted in favor of moving forward with a PIP process. The final motion (as clarified by the city manager) directed HR to narrow the list of concerns into a specific draft PIP and return a proposed plan to council. The council debated training scope; members suggested leadership training (for example, courses through the Florida Association of City Clerks), public‑records practice improvements, and council‑clerk one‑on‑one meeting cadences as potential components. Council members also discussed timelines (90–120 days was mentioned as a reasonable implementation window for progress and monitoring) and the need to clarify responsibilities between the clerk, city manager and other departments for items such as calendar management.
Public comment: Multiple members of the public spoke during the meeting. Some attendees urged the council to support and train the clerk, describing her as helpful and long‑serving; others urged corrective action. Public commenters also raised related concerns about other departments and general government responsiveness.
Outcome: Council instructed HR to prepare and return a proposed PIP for the clerk that focuses on narrowed items (leadership/communication training and public‑records handling/process changes) and to include timelines and measurable steps. A council vote to move forward was recorded; the subsequent direction to HR to prepare a draft PIP also passed by council vote. Specific disciplinary actions were not taken at the meeting.
Why it matters: The clerk is the city’s records custodian and the council’s administrative officer; the discussion addressed transparency, public‑records compliance (Chapter 119, Florida Statutes was cited by staff and the clerk), and operational practices that affect council–staff communication and public access to records.
What’s next: HR will prepare a draft PIP that defines measurable tasks, training expectations and timelines and return it to the council for review. Council members requested clarity on responsibilities (who provides calendar items, who is responsible for distribution of meeting materials) to be reflected in the plan where applicable.
