Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission votes 2–1 to keep personnel director as a merit position; refers recruitment to career service council
Summary
After debate over recruitment, tenure and the merits of appointment versus merit status, the commission voted 2–1 to retain the personnel director as a merit-classified position and to refer recruitment to the career service council for candidate referral.
The commission considered two resolutions offering alternative classifications for the county personnel director position: retain the role as a merit-position under the career service process, or convert it to an appointed position. Staff explained statutory changes that allow a commission to alter classification for the next hire and outlined procedural differences for recruitment and due process.
Supporters of retaining merit status said it preserves employee protections and an established vetting process through the career service council; proponents of appointment argued the appointed route provides hiring flexibility and that appointed hires can later be converted to merit status if needed. One commissioner cited experience around the state and argued that an appointed process can be practical for larger counties; another commissioner expressed concern about limiting employee protections.
After discussion, a motion to maintain the personnel director as a merit position and refer recruitment to the career service council passed on a 2–1 vote. The commission chair said the career service council would vet applicants and provide three names for the commission to consider.
