Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the It Telecom topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board suspends district cell‑phone policy after IT says switching to Google Voice could save about $20–$26K a year
Summary
Trustees voted to suspend the district’s cell‑phone policy and pursue a Google Voice migration for most district lines; trustees said board and superintendent lines will remain active while IT and counsel work through implementation and records access procedures.
The Douglas County School District board voted unanimously on June 26 to suspend Board Policy 8.12 and its administrative regulation that had authorized district‑issued cell phones, after an Information Technology presentation said switching most staff lines to a Google Voice solution would reduce annual telecom costs.
IT director Jesse Bates told trustees the district currently carries roughly 62 FirstNet/cellular lines at an average annual cost of about $36,000. Moving those lines to a Google Voice deployment for staff — with district numbers delivered through a Google Voice app on employees’ personal devices — would carry an estimated licensing cost in the $10,000–$15,000 range, Bates said; he described a likely first‑year savings in the neighborhood of $20,000–$26,000.
Trustees asked about coverage in campus “dead zones” and during power outages. IT staff said the district plans to enable Google Voice over site Wi‑Fi where available and to add phones to Wi‑Fi networks; Wi‑Fi calling would allow phones to send and receive calls on campus even where cellular coverage is weak. Staff noted that UPS battery backup on district network equipment typically provides 30–90 minutes of run time for on‑site networking equipment during outages, and that the district has recently distributed two‑way radios to school sites as a separate safety‑communications layer.
Board members and staff emphasized records and public‑records access. IT and counsel said messages and call logs made through Google Voice can be retained centrally in the district’s Google environment (searchable in Google Vault) and thus are discoverable for public‑records requests without needing access to employees’ personal phones. Trustees also directed that district‑owned trustee phones and the superintendent’s district line remain active because those lines are subject to public‑records rules and oversight.
Public comment at the meeting supported cost savings but urged caution to ensure staff have reliable communications in emergencies. The board’s motion to suspend BP 8.12 passed unanimously; staff said IT will proceed with implementation planning, recycling or decommissioning of district handsets and engagement with legal counsel to finalize public‑records and technical details.
The board asked staff to return with a detailed implementation plan and timeline, including any contract termination costs; IT said a small number of lines are still under contract but staff do not expect termination penalties that would exceed the projected savings.
