Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Future Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Steering committee reviews draft future land use map and outlines rezoning timeline
Summary
Committee reviewed draft future land use map colors (low/medium/high density, commercial, industrial), discussed using the map to reduce developer risk and heard staff outline a ~45‑day pathway for future land use amendments and rezoning (planning commission public hearing to council).
The Effingham steering committee spent a significant portion of the meeting reviewing the draft future land use map and the procedural steps that would translate map changes into rezonings.
Speaker 1 explained that the future land use map is an advisory tool that signals where the city wants different types of development to occur; changing a map color from industrial/commercial to medium/high-density residential reduces perceived risk for a prospective developer. "If it's in line with the future land use map, that eliminates some of that feeling of risk because they're like, no — that's in harmony with what the community has said," Speaker 2 said.
Staff walked the committee through the formal process: a notice published in the paper, a planning commission public hearing (example date discussed: April 8), a planning commission recommendation and then city council consideration (example April 15). "Ballpark, 4 weeks. 45 days," Speaker 1 said, describing the typical sequence from notice to council action when things proceed without delay.
Speakers emphasized that the committee should proactively identify areas where utilities already exist (for example, South Veterans Drive) to prioritize housing overlays and reduce the cost of extending water and sewer. Participants also discussed whether to expand mixed‑use plan development options or refine the planned unit development process to permit more administrative approval pathways while maintaining public notice and community protections.
No rezoning action was taken at the meeting; committee members asked staff to circulate draft mapping changes and to bring recommended future land use edits to the planning commission and council in time for the stated public‑hearing window.
