Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the GID Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brighton adopts policy requiring South Brighton GID inclusion petitions with annexation or development applications
Summary
The council unanimously adopted a resolution requiring properties in the South Brighton General Improvement District inclusion area to file petitions for inclusion at annexation or concurrent with development applications; staff said the policy is intended to spread costs for regional infrastructure and a consultant estimated a potential 10–15 mil range for financing.
Get email alerts on the GID Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Brighton City Council voted unanimously to adopt a resolution directing that properties inside the South Brighton General Improvement District (GID) inclusion area submit petitions to join the GID at the time of annexation or with future development applications.
Community Development Director Holly Prather told the council the GID, established in 2004, was created to facilitate construction of regional infrastructure improvements in the southern portion of the city. Prather said staff wants to require inclusion petitions for properties likely to benefit from major roadway and drainage improvements along corridors such as 120th Avenue and Sable Boulevard so the costs are shared equitably among developments.
Prather said the policy would be processed concurrently with annexation or development approvals and that the GID board retains authority to hold a public hearing and vote on any petition. When Council member Snyder asked about potential financing, staff said the current mill is zero but a consultant study (Economic Planning and Systems) evaluated an anticipated range of about 10 to 15 mills depending on project need.
Mayor Pro Tem Padilla moved the resolution and Council member Snyder seconded; the council approved the item on a roll call vote of 7 to 0 with 1 absent.
Staff said the policy aims to create a "fair playing field" so that future and in-process developments are treated consistently and properties that directly benefit will contribute to the costs of regional improvements.
