Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baldwin City Council approves conditional use permit for short-term rental at 920 Grove, removes platform name
Summary
The council approved Ordinance 15‑29 allowing a conditional use permit for a short-term rental at 920 Grove and voted to remove a specific platform reference ("Airbnb") from the text. Council and public debate centered on enforcement, the definition of 'short term' and whether the city needs an ordinance rather than individual CUPs.
Baldwin City Council on Monday adopted Ordinance 15‑29, approving a conditional use permit that will allow a short‑term rental at 920 Grove Street and removing a platform-specific reference from the draft language.
Planning staff told the council the application was heard by the Planning Commission on Dec. 9 and was recommended unanimously for approval. During council discussion, members questioned why the CUP text named platforms such as "Airbnb" and raised whether the CUP imposes any new regulations beyond existing city code. Planning staff said the reference dated from earlier practice and could be removed; the council agreed to eliminate the platform name and proceed with the CUP as presented.
Public commenters pressed the council on definitions and enforcement. Jerry Smith asked, "What do you call short term? How long is short term?" Planning staff replied that short‑term rentals are typically defined as 30 days or less and that the city code does not specify a single length but treats month‑to‑month or lease arrangements differently from short‑term stays.
Local property owner Joe Torgerson, who said he owns an Airbnb in town, criticized gaps in enforcement. "People that are going through it legally have to pay the fees," he said. "We can just have people that go through and not pay the fees and save the processing fee." He urged clearer enforcement so those who follow the process are not disadvantaged.
City legal counsel cautioned that using CUPs in an ad hoc way can create inconsistent enforcement and recommended that the city consider a formal ordinance if it wants uniform requirements and enforceability. "If you want to have an ordinance that addresses this, then I think you need to have an ordinance that addresses it," the legal adviser said, noting the challenge of enforcing disparate approaches.
After discussion and public comment, Councilor Jay (last name not specified on the record) moved to pass Ordinance 15‑29 with the Airbnb reference removed; the motion was seconded and the council carried the ordinance by roll‑call vote. The council recorded no nays during the roll call and the ordinance was declared passed.
The vote implements a site‑specific CUP for 920 Grove; staff and council members said the city still needs to consider whether broader ordinance language, or a separate long‑term rental policy, is necessary to allow uniform enforcement. No fines or enforcement penalties for noncompliant short‑term rentals were specified in the CUP discussion; staff said the current process charges a $125 application fee for a CUP and that enforcement mechanisms would require separate policy or ordinance action.
The council’s action trips follow‑up items for staff: update the CUP language to remove platform names, report back on enforcement options and penalties for unpermitted rentals, and consider whether a separate ordinance for short‑term or long‑term rental regulation is warranted.
