Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Baldwin City weighs selling banked renewable energy credits; council delays decision
Summary
City staff estimated banked renewable energy credits (RECs) have an unsold value of about $29,000 and outlined options to sell, bank or retire them. Council members asked whether selling would affect marketing as a "green" city or eligibility for grants and asked staff to get more KMEA guidance before deciding.
City utility staff told the Baldwin City Council the city has banked renewable energy credits (RECs) from past community solar projects and estimated the unsold credits have a current market value of about $29,000.
The presenter explained the city can retire RECs (keep the claim to use renewable energy), sell them for revenue, or continue to bank them. "There's been some talk about whether or not you guys would like to monetize those," the presenter said, noting that older credits carry lower value but current market rates for recent credits are roughly $2 per REC in the presenter’s estimate.
Council members asked what the city would lose by selling credits. Several members noted the city currently markets itself as a 'green' community and asked whether selling RECs would prevent that claim or affect eligibility for grants or marketing advantages. The presenter said he would check with KMEA on unintended consequences, including whether grant eligibility or promotional claims would be affected.
Fiscal considerations were part of the discussion: the presenter estimated immediate proceeds of about $30,000 from a one‑time sale and ongoing potential of roughly $20,000 per year if the city chose to market credits going forward. Some council members argued citizens would prefer lower rates, while others emphasized the marketing and strategic value of being able to claim renewable generation. Several council members recommended postponing action and asked staff to gather more information from KMEA and affected committees before a future vote.
Next steps: council asked staff to check with KMEA about regulatory or grant implications, unintended consequences of selling credits, and to return with specific numbers and options at a future meeting.
