Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marina project put on hold after federal grant funding shrinks, board told
Summary
Staff reported that key federal grants that would have funded a deep-water marina and habitat islands have been reduced or lost; the presenter recommended pausing the project and building a reserve so the city can move quickly if funding returns.
Gail (presenting) told the board that several federal funding streams the project relied on have been reduced or canceled, and she recommended pausing work on the proposed deep-water marina until the grant landscape stabilizes.
“Since this was grant driven, I suggest we put this marina project on hold,” Gail said after summarizing research from consultant Greg Weicamp of Edgewater Resources. She told the board that the FEMA BRIC (Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities) funding that had been expected for the Marine Park habitat islands has been cancelled for the moment and that other federal programs are also offering fewer funds.
Gail said the project remains important to the island—citing a lack of deep-water and transient slips and local demand from tournament and larger vessels—but that without the grant money the city could not proceed at the previously planned scope. She described two preferred locations from the feasibility study: the Sea Ranch location (favored by grantors for lower environmental impact) and a second site nearer the causeway that would be more complex and would likely require acquisition or negotiation with private landowners.
Gail recommended budgeting and building a local reserve for a future marina project so the city can move quickly if grants return or a private partner emerges. She cited preliminary study and permitting costs as nontrivial: the feasibility study had cost nearly $60,000 and permitting and study work to reach construction-ready status could approach several hundred thousand dollars, with full permitting and construction-phase requirements potentially much larger.
No formal board action was taken; the item was presented as an update and for discussion. Board members discussed whether the county might provide written support or land commitments in the future and whether the city should allocate reserve funds to preserve readiness for a future funding window.
