Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Victory Mansion roof repair eyed for historic-preservation grant; county asked to commit match
Summary
Project consultants told commissioners the Victory Mansion needs extensive slate-roof work estimated between $215,000 and $275,000; the county was asked to commit a potential $100,000 match if the project applies for a 50/50 Keystone Preservation grant due March 3.
A consultant reported to Beaver County commissioners that the Victory Mansion’s slate roof is deteriorating and that a full roof and flashing replacement has been estimated at roughly $215,000 to $275,000. The consultant said the county could apply for a Keystone Historic Preservation planning grant that requires a 50/50 match; the maximum grant award is $100,000, which would require a $100,000 county match if the full grant is requested.
Jessica, with Landmark SGA and LBN Partners, described visual signs of slate delamination and failing copper flashing at chimney and wall intersections and noted interior water damage and paint bubbling in plaster. She said the roof appears to be Pennsylvania black slate with an expected historic life of about 60 years when in good condition; the existing slate is well beyond that life and shows delamination from mineral inclusions.
Consultants presented a substitute synthetic slate as an alternate that may comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s standards if approved, but advised that authentic slate is the recommended approach for a property on the National Register. The project team said they have construction drawings and that local contractors provided estimates in the $215,000–$275,000 range; one local slate expert offered a figure under $200,000 but cautioned that final bids may vary.
County commissioners and staff discussed funding. A commissioner noted the county’s diminished reserves and said the county’s ability to provide matching funds would require further conversation. The consultant asked commissioners for a commitment to match funds if the county pursues the grant; the application deadline was reported as March 3.
No formal commitment or vote was recorded at the meeting. Staff said they would follow up on contract timelines and bids and report back to the commission as they pursue grant application and procurement steps.
