Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Emergency Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission adopts updated multi‑hazard mitigation plan to remain eligible for federal disaster funding

2627516 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Cass County moved to adopt an updated multi‑hazard mitigation plan, which includes technological and adversarial threats; staff said formal adoption is required to maintain eligibility for certain federal disaster mitigation dollars.

Emergency management staff recommended the commission sign a resolution updating the county’s multi‑hazard mitigation plan; the commission approved the resolution.

Mr. Prognac (emergency management) explained the plan update took several years to prepare and incorporated extensive stakeholder outreach and contractor (KLJ) work. He said participation and formal adoption by jurisdictions is a prerequisite for communities seeking FEMA mitigation dollars after a disaster, and that the updated plan also includes technological and adversarial threats in addition to natural hazards.

Prognac noted the county’s prior plan expired the previous October and that obtaining a signed resolution would keep the county in compliance with state and federal review processes. He emphasized that items identified in the mitigation plan are not binding obligations but serve as a documented list for future grant applications and project prioritization.

The commission voted to approve the resolution; staff said the electronic plan will be reviewed by the State Department of Emergency Services and FEMA as part of the formal approval process. Commissioners asked clarifying questions and received confirmation that the county will continue to coordinate with highway and other departments to identify projects that could leverage mitigation dollars.

Ending: The preservation of eligibility for federal mitigation funding and the inclusion of technological threats were emphasized as reasons for timely adoption.