Residents and planning commissioner urge Westminster not to defy new transit-oriented housing law; some speakers urge caution

Westminster — During public comment at the Feb. 10 council meeting, several residents and a planning-commission alternate urged the City Council to examine and comply with a state transit-oriented communities law referred to in testimony as "House Bill 13 13."

Why it matters: The law affects zoning near frequent transit stops and has prompted questions in Westminster about local water supply, local control over zoning and whether state requirements would force the city to allow denser housing in some areas. Council members said they are studying the bills and coordinating with regional partners and the governor’s office.

Planning-commission alternate Tim Pegg told the council he was concerned that some of the council’s earlier discussion mischaracterized the law. "I don't think Westminster should choose to break the law," Pegg said, adding that the bill does not require municipal governments to build housing or to provide free housing. He urged council to "take the time to understand how far off we are from meeting our requirements." (Tim Pegg, public commenter; identified in testimony as an alternate on Westminster’s Planning Commission.)

Resident Kate Fuller said she supports the law’s intent in transit-served areas and described personal experience with an older relative who can live without a car because of transit access. "This law specifically pertains to areas near existing frequent transit," Fuller said, and she urged council to do the report "and point out any real shortfalls in specific areas." (Kate Fuller, resident.)

Other public commenters voiced opposition to the state measure. Karen Calabity said she does not view the bill as a solution to local housing problems and called some proposed developments poor planning; she praised Mayor Nancy McNally and staff for “taking stock” of local planning needs. (Karen Calabity, resident.)

Council response and next steps: Mayor Pro Tem Nirmala described long-term local planning efforts around transit stations and said water, sanitary sewer and drainage constraints are being considered in any local response. Councilor Carmelia said she had requested a meeting with staff and planning to better understand the bill’s implications and to protect home-rule authority; other council members said they are engaging regionally with neighboring jurisdictions and the governor’s office on the matter.

What the record shows: Speakers repeatedly referenced an exemption for areas with insufficient water supply and noted that the law includes periodic review requirements. Council asked staff to analyze local water supply, tap fee adequacy and other constraints and to return with a report. No formal council action on the law occurred at the Feb. 10 meeting.