Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adu topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants pitch ADU incentive package for Basalt as commissioners back staff to draft program
Summary
Design Workshop and EPS presented an ADU incentive program including clarified ADU definitions, streamlined PUD amendments, HOA amendment templates, and financing options (grants, revolving loans, deed restrictions). Commissioners urged targeted rules to limit short‑term rentals and asked staff to convert recommendations into a motion for council consideration.
Design Workshop consultant Jessica Guerra presented a proposal to help Basalt homeowners build accessory dwelling units (ADUs), framing them as a tool to expand smaller housing options, support multigenerational living and provide supplemental income for property owners.
Guerra said the team interviewed multiple single‑family homeowners associations and completed a feasibility analysis. She told the commission the consultants modeled a 700‑square‑foot ADU with a construction cost assumption of $500 per square foot — a $425,000 build — and estimated market rent “just over $3,400,” with a potential break‑even around year eight absent construction financing. She said those numbers make upfront funding or low‑interest loans essential to drive participation.
The consultants recommended several program elements: clarify ADU definitions and accessory‑structure language in the land‑use code; streamline PUD amendments so existing PUDs can more easily legally add ADUs; provide HOA amendment support such as model covenant language to reduce legal costs for associations; and create financial incentives — either grants (consultants cited an Eagle County example with a $150,000 cap) tied to deed restrictions or a revolving loan fund administered by the town.
Guerra noted state action that requires some Colorado communities to allow one by‑right ADU on single‑family parcels but stressed that the particular state house bill she referenced “does not apply to Basalt” while advising the commission the bill’s approach influences statewide expectations about ADUs. She added that the state bill can preempt local HOA rules in the jurisdictions where it applies.
Commissioners pressed the consultants on enforcement and unintended uses. Several commissioners and HOA representatives voiced concern that ADUs could be converted into short‑term rentals or expanded into de‑facto additional primary housing. One commissioner cited Aspen’s experience, saying incentive‑driven ADUs there sometimes “sit empty” and are used primarily as extra square footage rather than workforce housing. Consultants said deed restrictions tied to funding, one‑year minimum leases and annual employment verification were program tools to reduce short‑term‑rental risk.
The Basalt Affordable Community Housing Commission (BOC) reviewed the recommendations and indicated support for the consultant approach. After questions and discussion about design standards, HOA legal hurdles and the limits of town authority over private covenants, a commissioner moved that staff take the consultants’ recommendations and draft a motion for the council to consider; the commission approved the motion by voice vote.
Next steps: staff will return with draft code language, suggested grant/loan terms, and options for deed‑restriction templates and administrative enforcement for the commission’s further review.
