Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Bridges topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rush County reviews three bridge grant applications totaling about $7.3 million
Summary
Rush County officials reviewed grant applications for three bridge projects — Bridge 189 in Millroy, Bridge 53 near Raleigh and Bridge 93 over Ben Davis Creek — with total project costs of roughly $7.3 million and county shares of about $1.47 million split over multiyear schedules.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Bridges topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rush County officials reviewed and moved to approve three bridge grant applications at the Nov. 10 meeting, citing total project costs and the county’s multiyear share.
Speaker 4 presented the first application for Bridge 189, located on 100 West just south of 244 in Millroy, saying the total cost is $2,352,000 and the county’s share would be $472,667 spread over a four- to five-year period. A motion to approve that application was made and seconded and passed.
The second application, for Bridge 53 on 900 North just east of Raleigh, was listed at a total cost of $2,426,872 with a county share of $485,283 over five years; the commission moved and seconded approval.
The third application covers Bridge 93, which crosses Ben Davis Creek on 350 East just north of 200 North. The total cost was listed as $2,550,257, with the county share $510,052 over five years; commissioners moved to approve that application as well.
Speaker 5 later asked county staff (Jerry) for copies of the application materials for the record. During discussion Speaker 4 noted differences in materials and methods used on other new bridges (reference to an “E5” concrete mix), saying the county had experienced only minor, expected cracking and that the vendor’s approach differed from what the county typically uses.
Next steps: staff will file the grant documentation and return with any required follow-up; the motions recorded at the meeting moved each application forward. The commission did not record a detailed roll-call vote in the transcript for these motions.
