Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Ethnic Studies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SFUSD board adopts ethnic-studies pilot after heated public comment and split debate
Summary
After more than an hour of public testimony both supporting and criticizing the Voices curriculum, the board approved purchase of an ethnic-studies pilot curriculum and related personnel permits; several commissioners warned the adoption should be followed by clear pilot criteria and implementation review.
The San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education on Aug. 26 voted to adopt a pilot ethnic-studies curriculum after extended public comment and debate among board members about process and scope.
Public comment filled much of the early meeting. Students and teachers testified in favor of ethnic studies as a course that supports belonging and academic outcomes; several speakers cited local research and student-survey results. Other parents and community members said the adopted 'Voices' curriculum was either insufficient to support a year-long mandate or presented political framing they considered inappropriate for a required course. Concerns raised repeatedly included an 11% special-education figure in the Dragon Gate petition (an adjacent agenda matter), the adequacy of teacher training, and whether a full-year mandate should be required districtwide.
During deliberations on the curriculum revote (item F-1), several commissioners said the district still needed a robust review and clearer criteria for evaluating the pilot. Commissioner Gupta urged staff to define success metrics, to clarify whether the course might properly be a one- or two-semester option and to identify how the pilot would be evaluated against student-outcome goals. Commissioner Ray said procedural and transparency lapses in prior handling had deepened community divisions and said he would vote no on adoption at this time.
The board approved the item on a roll-call vote of 6 in favor, 1 opposed; vote counts were recorded in the official roll call. The board also approved related provisional intern permits and waivers for credentialing (16 provisional intern permits and two waivers were noted by the superintendent's designee), and later passed the consent agenda including those personnel items.
Supporters of the one-year course argued that year-long exposure is necessary for depth and alignment with college A-G requirements; critics argued for better vetting, teacher training and for making ethnic studies an elective or one-semester course while the district develops firmer curricula and implementation supports.
The board asked staff to return with clearly defined pilot criteria and to provide a public evaluation plan so the board and public can assess whether the pilot meets statutory and district student-outcome requirements.
