Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Conditional Use Permit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council grants conditional-use permit for home-occupation office at 125 Skycroft Circle

Liberty Hill City Council · October 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council unanimously approved a conditional-use permit allowing Revolt Arms LLC to operate a home-occupation office at 125 Skycroft Circle (Butler Farms Phase 9). Applicants said the business will initially ship items, later add engraving in a home office, and comply with ATF and security requirements.

The Liberty Hill City Council approved a conditional-use permit Tuesday to allow Revolt Arms LLC to operate a home-occupation office at 125 Skycroft Circle (Lot 44, Block A, Butler Farms Phase 9), Williamson CAD parcel R622226.

City staff and the planning and zoning commission recommended approval, saying they did not expect nuisances such as noise, dust, increased trash or traffic. Staff noted the applicants told them the business will begin with shipping only and that any engraving would be performed in the bedroom where the home office is located.

An applicant who identified themselves as representing Revolt Arms LLC said the business already operates from a residence in California, uses security cameras, will not host customers at the home and intends to comply with ATF rules. "We comply with everything as required by the ATF," the applicant stated when answering council questions.

Council moved to adopt Ordinance No. 2025-0-043 to authorize the CUP; the ordinance caption and applicable UDC language were read into the record. The council approved the CUP on a recorded 7–0 vote.

The action allows the owners to operate a home-based office under the city's Unified Development Code rules for home occupations in high-density residential districts; the consent included standard ordinance language about findings, codification and an effective date. No additional conditions or restrictions were recorded in the meeting minutes.