Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parental Leave topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sponsors seek fixes to postpartum leave law; advocates warn changes would weaken protections
Summary
Representative Berry asked the committee to tighten drafting in last year's postpartum and pediatric appointment leave law; advocates and clinicians said proposed fixes (15‑day notice, reinstatement exceptions) would chill use and harm maternal mental‑health care access.
Representative Ross Berry told the committee he intended to correct drafting errors in the statute that created limited unpaid leave for parents during a child's first year. Berry said the statute’s vague phrase “reasonable notice” and an apparent omission about employee production of documentation leave employers and workers uncertain and invite inconsistent enforcement; he proposed inserting a concrete notice window (he suggested 15 days as an example) and requiring employees to provide documentation when an employer requests it.
Opponents, including Mackenzie Nicholson of MomsRising and clinicians who work in perinatal mental‑health, urged the committee to leave the existing text intact. Nicholson said a fixed advance‑notice requirement is impractical for typical pediatric scheduling and emergency pediatric or maternal care: “Babies don't give 15 days notice when they get sick,” she said. Testimony emphasized that the first year after birth is a time of heightened maternal morbidity and that requiring documentation or strict notice could deter parents from seeking care.
Department of Labor staff said the agency is neutral on the bill and can enforce the measure as written but raised questions that have arisen in training (for example how to treat multiple births: whether the 25‑hour allowance applies per child or per birthing event). DOL and other witnesses asked the legislature to clarify ambiguous language rather than create new exceptions that could weaken job protections.
What’s next: Committee members and sponsors discussed possible targeted amendments — e.g., explicit emergency carveouts and clearer definition of “position” vs. “duties” for reinstatement — and multiple stakeholders offered to work on redrafting.
Quotes: “This law moves us forward,” physician‑advocate Heather Martin said, urging retention of protections; “If we claim to support moms and babies, then we have to let them go to the doctor,” Mackenzie Nicholson testified.
Ending: The committee closed the hearing after extended testimony; sponsors and advocates agreed to continue negotiating specific drafting changes.
