Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Urban Forestry topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Framingham planners decline request to remove large street tree on Grama Street

Framingham Planning Board · January 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Resident Brian Fabry asked the board to allow removal of a street tree he says sits about 10 feet closer to his house than neighboring trees; the board and tree warden advocated preservation, suggested trimming and non‑destructive measures, and a motion to approve removal failed.

Brian Fabry, a Grama Street resident, asked the Framingham Planning Board to approve removal of a street tree he said is much closer to his house than other trees and that he fears root or foundation damage. "The data clearly shows that the Grand Street tree is much closer than all the other trees on Mansfield Street ... by approximately 10 feet," Fabry told the board.

Board members and Chair Ted Cosgrove said the tree contributes to the street’s character and scenic designation and urged alternatives to removal. Members suggested having the tree warden revisit the property in spring, trimming branches that overhang the house and exploring measures to keep squirrels from getting under solar panels. Tree Warden Rebecca Now told the board there is no formal replanting process but the city attempts to offer replacement trees when planting sites are suitable and that penalties for unauthorized removals are available under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 87.

A board member moved to approve the applicant’s request to remove the tree; the motion was seconded and put to a voice vote. Multiple members said they opposed removal and the motion did not carry. The board recorded its reluctance to remove a tree that members described as an integral part of the neighborhood and directed the tree warden and the homeowner to continue working on trimming and mitigation options.

The board noted the broader issue of missing scenic‑road trees on nearby streets and discussed replacement opportunities when public works projects occur. The board closed the item without approving removal.