Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Convention Center Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Springfield council reviews revised hotel-motel tax language after outreach; staff to refine ballot text
Summary
After outreach to hoteliers, neighborhood groups and downtown businesses and a 1,233-response survey, councilmembers discussed adding a 35-year sunset and clearer operation-and-maintenance language to a proposed hotel-motel tax for a regional convention and event center; staff were asked to refine ballot language and the council voted to go into a closed session on related legal and real-estate matters.
City Manager David told the City Council that staff had conducted multiple listening sessions and received 1,233 survey responses about a proposed increase in the hotel-motel license tax to fund a regional convention and event center. "45 to 55 are open to a revised proposal if details improve," he said, while 27 to 30 percent remain "firmly opposed" and 15 to 25 percent are "skeptical or indifferent." David said residents repeatedly asked for more specificity on location, parking and transit, and expressed concern that other city funds not be tapped for the project.
Council members pressed staff on practical details the public raised. Council member Jensen praised the outreach and said the feedback matched lessons from a recent leadership visit to Cincinnati: "for any significant public works project or investment in your downtown, you first have to make sure people feel safe going there and that they have a good way to get there." Several council members said safety, cleanliness and transit connectivity need visible, parallel action if the city asks voters to approve a tax increase.
Staff counsel Jordan described the constraints of ballot text and proposed adding a sunset clause to the measure. Jordan said the draft language under consideration would include a basic 35-year sunset: if adopted as written, the tax increase would expire after 35 years. Council members debated whether a partial sunset would confuse voters or whether a full 35‑year sunset would leave the city unable to fund long-term maintenance and reinvestment. David and other council members urged creating a plan now for the pool of funds that will exist when current bonds expire so some revenue can be reserved for maintenance and operations.
Several council members raised the risk that $30,000,000 in state appropriations could be lost if the city delays. Staff said state officials are watching community support but gave no promise the funds would be released. Council members also requested clearer ballot language that explicitly allows use of proceeds for "construction, operation and maintenance" of a convention or event center so voters understand long‑term uses.
Council members discussed timing and process. Staff advised that to place the measure on the April ballot the city must act by the Tuesday after its second January meeting (staff cited the 27th as the relevant date) and described why drafts sometimes include an "emergency" clause to allow amendment without a double reading; the council may decline to invoke that clause and advance the item for an additional reading instead.
Council member Horton announced a public town hall on Feb. 13 at Library Station to present staff actions on crime, neighborhood health and infrastructure and to solicit further input on transit and equity concerns tied to the proposal.
After debate the council approved a motion to convene a closed meeting to discuss legal actions, real-estate transactions and sealed bids under the cited sections; the motion passed on roll call. The council recessed briefly to configure phone access for the closed session. The council did not yet adopt final ballot language; staff were directed to workshop and return refined language before the next formal vote.
