Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Compplan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Scappoose council backs comprehensive-plan redesignation while debating restrictive covenants for Parker parcels
Summary
After two public commenters urged caution, the council agreed to proceed with redesignating identified parcels on the comprehensive-plan map from industrial to expanded commercial, while leaving annexation and any restrictive covenant discussions for the later annexation/master-plan process.
The Scappoose City Council voted to proceed with redesignating parcels identified for future development on the city's comprehensive-plan map from industrial to expanded commercial, but members emphasized that rezoning and any legally binding restrictive covenants would be considered later during annexation and master-plan review.
Public commenters raised concerns and alternatives before the council's work session resumed. Dwayne Rosenthal told the council that "once they go into the city with a fixed zone, that opportunity is gone," and urged the city to consider a restrictive covenant limiting the number of housing units so the community can preserve industrial and commercial opportunities. David Sedaris recommended subdividing large parcels to allow more organic, smaller-scale development and warned landowners may place deed restrictions that are hard to reverse.
City staff explained that the comprehensive-plan map change is a long-range designation only and would not change county zoning or automatically annex property; annexation and rezoning would come later when landowners apply and the Planning Commission makes a recommendation to council. Staff noted the tradeoff: more flexibility in land use can attract industrial investment and jobs, while restrictive covenants or stricter designations can limit future options but protect certain community priorities.
Council discussion reflected that tradeoff. Some members said they preferred maximum flexibility and want to see conceptual plans before committing to larger redesignations; others said they would be more comfortable rezoning larger parcels if property owners or developers agreed to explore restrictive covenants limiting housing density. Concerns included preserving rail-access industrial opportunities, maintaining livability and green space, and avoiding legal exposure if covenants are later rescinded.
The council did not adopt any covenant or rezoning tonight. Instead members agreed to proceed with the comprehensive-plan redesignation process and to revisit restrictive-covenant language, funding and potential legal constraints during the annexation and master-plan phases, including seeking community feedback prior to any final annexation decision.
