Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Residences topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers weigh study committee to examine community residences, municipal impacts
Summary
HB 17‑63 sponsor proposed an amendment to form a legislative study committee to examine siting, zoning, municipal impacts and potential payment‑in‑lieu mechanisms for community residential facilities. Town officials described incidents, infrastructure strains and lost tax revenue; providers and area agencies supported a study and emphasized collaboration.
Representative Mike Drago, sponsor of HB 17‑63, described constituent complaints about community residential facilities operating in residential neighborhoods and said municipalities have reported unexpected burdens — from increased emergency calls to perceived declines in property values and lack of municipal notice. Drago said his original bill ran into federal preemption and Fair Housing Act constraints on zoning, so he proposed an amendment to form a study committee instead.
Local officials and selectboard members testified to incidents of elopement and property damage, concerns about septic and road capacity, and the fiscal impact when previously taxable properties convert to tax‑exempt, state‑funded facilities. Municipal speakers asked that study membership explicitly include local officials (selectboard members, town managers) and urged examination of payment‑in‑lieu‑of‑tax (PILOT) arrangements and public‑safety protocols.
Provider witnesses, area agency leaders and some legislators supported a study committee that would include providers, DHHS licensing staff, emergency services and municipal representatives to identify practical operational and regulatory changes that would protect community safety and preserve inclusive housing options. DHHS cautioned about overlap with prior study work but offered to participate and provide data. The committee closed the hearing and will consider the proposed amendment.
