Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel approves amended requirement for caution signs at large above-ground oil storage tanks

Joint Standing Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, Maine Legislature · January 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In a heated work session, the committee approved an amended motion requiring signage at above-ground oil storage facilities (tanks >39,000 gallons) warning about hazardous air pollutants, volatile organic compounds and flammable vapors and removing QR codes; members debated spacing (every 100 feet) and whether signs would alarm the public.

The Environment and Natural Resources Committee advanced an amended proposal on LD 1507 that would require caution signage at large above-ground oil storage facilities (commonly called tank farms) and set signage content and spacing.

Representative Dan Ankeles moved to delete QR-code references, specify a 39,000-gallon threshold for covered tanks, and revise the sign text to read: "Caution: petroleum storage area. Hazardous air pollutants, volatile organic compounds, and flammable vapors may be present." Representative Kepler seconded the amendment. The committee then debated sign spacing (a department representative recommended installation every 100 feet) and whether such warnings would unduly alarm passersby.

Representative Kimball Campbell opposed broad statewide signage, saying local managers were not consulted and signs could unnecessarily alarm residents; other lawmakers, including Representative Vicki Dudera, said the language educates new populations and coastal communities and ensures consistent notice. Chair Tepler noted the department helped develop the language.

The committee voted to call the question and then on the substantive amendment; the chair recorded a majority in favor with three opposed. Members noted a minority report would be available. The measure will move forward in the work-session process for final text and potential inclusion in the sponsor's bill package.