Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Speed Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sherwood explores mobile speed‑camera pilot; council asks staff for costs, legal clarity and back‑office plan
Summary
Councilors discussed a vendor pilot for mobile speed cameras (VeriMobility), legal ambiguity over enforcement thresholds (11 mph vs. lower in school zones), an estimated $6,000/month unit cost for a full year, and potential heavy back‑end processing; staff was asked to provide detailed cost and operational plans.
Sherwood councilors on Tuesday spent substantial time considering mobile speed‑enforcement devices and asked staff to return with cost estimates, back‑office processing needs and legal advice before any pilot or contract is approved.
Chief (police) described new, portable one‑directional speed units offered by a current vendor (VeriMobility) that capture plate and driver images and can be moved periodically; he said the vendor offered a three‑month pilot in which the first 30 days would be used for education at the vendor’s expense. "They offered a 3 month pilot program... the first 30 days of either program, VeriMobility eats the cost of that for education," staff said.
Council discussion focused on enforcement thresholds and capacity. State and local statutes have traditionally set an 11‑mph threshold for certain automated enforcement; councilors debated whether the city should set a lower threshold in school and residential zones (members proposed 6 mph in school zones). The city attorney said the recent legislation governing mobile cameras is silent on the 11‑mph rule that applies to some camera types, giving the council discretion but creating some legal ambiguity.
Staff estimated operational costs of roughly $6,000 per unit per month for a full‑year contract and signaled flexibility in procurement models (flat fee versus revenue share). Chief and other staff warned the program would require substantial back‑end processing — review, ticketing, court processing and finance — and that a deployed unit could produce hundreds to about 1,000 citations per month depending on location. "We could easily do probably 1,000 citations a month... conservatively, 400–500," the chief said.
Council asked staff to run numbers on expected citation volumes, vendor pricing options and the additional staff or system support needed to process tickets and court filings; staff also was asked to coordinate with the traffic advisory committee and return with pilot‑program specifics and front‑end/back‑office cost estimates.
Next steps: staff will obtain firm vendor pricing, model budget options (flat fee vs. revenue split), estimate staff and court processing needs, and present a recommended pilot design for council consideration.
