Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Firearms And Hunter Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers Weigh Two Gun‑education Proposals: Mandatory School Gun‑safety vs Encouraging Hunter Ed
Summary
Lawmakers heard competing ideas: HB 1830 would require DOE to establish mandatory firearm‑safety training statewide, while HB 1122 would encourage districts to offer Fish & Game hunter‑education courses and access federal Pittman‑Robertson funds; witnesses ranged from superintendents offering existing voluntary programs to mental‑health and parental advocates urging caution about mandates and school time.
Two bills about firearms and outdoors education drew extended testimony at the House Education Policy Committee.
HB 1830, introduced by Representative Katie Pedernell, would require the Department of Education to establish a mandatory firearm‑safety training program for all public schools and appropriates initial funds in the bill. Opponents, including education associations and several parents, argued the bill would be an unnecessary unfunded mandate that diverts instructional time and imposes administrative and reporting burdens on districts. "Firearm safety is a responsibility of adults, not kids," testified Kathleen Slover, citing research that child‑directed safety slogans do not reliably change behavior.
HB 1122, introduced by Representative McFarland (as amended), encourages schools to offer New Hampshire Fish & Game hunter‑education courses, preserve parental opt‑out, and promote access to federal Pittman‑Robertson matching funds. Fish & Game representatives and superintendents described existing district programs: many schools partner with external clubs or ranges for live‑fire activities, use volunteer instructors who undergo background checks, and run the course as an elective or as after‑school programming. Superintendent Tim Broderick of Alton and Barnstead said his districts run successful opt‑in hunter‑education classes at no cost to families by partnering with local organizations and Fish & Game.
Supporters of HB 1122 emphasized local control and voluntary participation. Representative Spillane, a Fish & Game Committee member and cosponsor, said Fish & Game will approve volunteer instructors and noted that Pittman‑Robertson funds can provide matching resources. Fish & Game legal staff acknowledged operational concerns including administrative load, volunteer capacity, and federal match rules; they flagged potential program integrity and audit requirements if schools rely on federal funds.
Committee members questioned opt‑in vs opt‑out design, whether the bills require live fire on campus, reporting burdens, data collection, and how liability and background checks are handled. Proponents repeatedly said neither bill intends to require live fire on school property and that local districts could schedule field days off‑site.
The committee closed the hearings without votes. Lawmakers signaled interest in technical amendments to address funding, reporting, and parental‑choice concerns before any committee recommendation.
