Get email alerts on the Committee Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee clears two routine bills: code cleanup and landlord storage period change
Summary
The Judiciary Committee handled two short agenda items before the immigration discussion: a code cleanup technical bill and an amended landlord-storage bill. The committee advanced both to the next stage; one vote tally was recorded.
Get email alerts on the Committee Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Judiciary Committee advanced two short items before taking up a larger immigration bill.
House Bill 16-82 (code cleanup) Representative Engleman introduced House Bill 16-82, described as a non-technical “cleanup” measure that removes duplicate section headings and makes drafting corrections to keep the state code concise. Committee members asked no substantive questions. A motion to pass was made and the committee called the roll; committee discussion indicated routine handling. The transcript does not record a final roll-call tally for HB 16-82 in the hearing record provided (vote total not specified in transcript).
House Bill 10-79 (landlord storage period amendment) Representative Zimmerman presented an amended version of House Bill 10-79. Amendment 5 removed language about squatters from the introduced bill and left a change to the statute governing landlord storage of tenant property: the bill would reduce the required storage period for a tenant’s property from 90 days to 30 days. The committee took the amendment by consent and then voted. The committee recorded the final tally on the bill: “Bill passes 9 to 0.”
What to watch These two items were routine for the committee and will move forward for further action; HB 16-82's roll-call tally was not specified in the transcript excerpt. The immigration bill that followed consumed the bulk of the hearing.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
