Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fee Schedule topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Baker City debates higher event and park fees as vendors and residents warn of harm to local traditions

Baker City Council · December 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff presented a proposed update to planning, park and street-closure fees intended to better cover event costs; residents and event organizers warned higher fees could push family events off Main Street and hurt small vendors. Staff agreed to return with detailed cost comparisons and revenue estimates.

City staff on the Baker City Council presented a proposed revision to planning, park and street-closure fees, saying the fee schedule has not been significantly updated since 2012 and that some event-related costs (including an estimated $3,600 to prepare for certain events) are not currently recovered.

The proposal, introduced by planning staff (identified in the record as Mary), breaks fees into categories such as single-day events, heavy-vehicle park use, multi-day park events and small- and large-scale parade/route closures. Mary said the draft is intended to "cover staff time" and noticing costs that have grown over time and to align Baker City with fee structures used by comparable municipalities.

Public commenters, including Jubilee vendors and residents, urged caution. Julie Mesfeld, who identified herself as a vendor (625 Washington Avenue), said the increase in vendor fees for some events — which she described as rising from $75 to $200 for out-of-town vendors this year — discouraged attendance and risked driving events to the fairgrounds: "If you tell them they're gonna pay a lot more than what we're paying now, we... will not do." She said steeper fees could cost the community family-focused programming.

Amber Bailey, who gave her address for the record, described how free or low-cost downtown events matter to families and urged the council to preserve affordable access for low-income residents and volunteer-run nonprofits: "These events that we get to have are extremely important to us as families... If we can keep it affordable, that would be the best thing."

Representatives of Baker City Downtown and event organizers told the council the intent of higher full-street-closure fees is to ensure events are planned and funded and noted growth at Taste of Baker; a spokesperson said token sales and average vendor payouts grew about 12% from 2024 to 2025 and that BCD will review out-of-downtown vendor fees in the new year.

Councilors asked staff for more data before any change is adopted. Multiple members requested a single spreadsheet showing current fees, proposed changes and peer-city comparators and asked staff to pull accounting data that demonstrates actual costs and projected revenue. Planning staff agreed to provide the requested breakdowns and said the council will revisit the proposal during the budget process (anticipated in March). No fee changes were adopted at the meeting.

The council also discussed exemptions and sliding scales for nonprofits and small community events; staff indicated the draft can be adjusted to provide lower fees or exceptions for nonprofit organizers. The next step is for staff to return with detailed cost comparisons, event accounting data and recommended language that clarifies exemptions and how any new revenues would be tracked.