Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Agreements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission recommends master development agreement template with edits to housing, triggers and ownership language
Summary
After lengthy review, the commission recommended the city adopt a standardized master development agreement template, asking staff to add exhibit bullet points for moderate‑income housing, reporting/triggers, strengthen recital language on developer ownership, and review a damages‑limitation clause.
Grantsville — The Planning Commission on Nov. 18 reviewed and voted to recommend a standardized Grantsville City master development agreement (MDA) template intended to streamline development agreements and make project obligations easier to track.
City counsel/consultant Jay Springer walked commissioners through the template structure, explaining that a short body would be accompanied by project‑specific exhibits (A–G) that capture the 'meat and potatoes' of negotiated terms. Springer said, "I would just tell them, stop using the old version. This is your version going forward," emphasizing the city's goal of consistent forms and clearer project exhibits.
Key changes requested: Commissioners and staff asked that Exhibit G include bullet points or template language for recurring items such as moderate‑income housing commitments, reporting and phase triggers, and build‑out milestones so those elements are not missed. The commission also asked staff to strengthen the recital language requiring the applicant to confirm ownership or authority to contract for the property and to revisit the limitation‑on‑monetary‑damages clause in section 7.7 for clarity.
Why it matters: Staff and commissioners said the template aims to reduce repetitive negotiation over form terms and focus negotiation on project‑specific deviations. The template is designed so that exhibits (site plans, modifications to standards, phasing schedules, and deed restrictions) are clearly documented and recorded with the agreement when appropriate.
Outcome and next steps: The commission voted to recommend approval of the MDA template with the minor revisions described (adding Exhibit G bullets for housing/triggers, clarifying ownership recitals and legal language tweaks). Staff will return a redlined template for final council consideration and legal review of the damages language.
What remains open: Commissioners asked staff to ensure civil design elements (stormwater, retention basins vs. public open space) are clearly depicted in exhibit site plans and to consider a staff checklist to help catch key items during review.
