Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Abatement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears repeated noise-abatement complaints; motion to investigate dies for lack of second
Summary
Board members raised multiple recent noise-abatement complaints about nighttime operations and pattern deviations at Hurricane Airport; an enforcement motion died for lack of a second and staff explained the airport's NAP is voluntary under a 1990 federal limitation.
A board member presented a series of noise-abatement concerns at the Hurricane City Airport Board meeting, saying there had been multiple incidents in the prior week-and-a-half of aircraft operations after dark and pattern deviations that affected nearby neighborhoods. The presenter cited a specific aircraft callsign and alleged that several of the incidents originated from the same company.
The board discussed whether the airport board could bring formal enforcement action. City staff explained there is an administrative complaint procedure for business-license violations overseen by the city recorder: a notice-of-violation letter is issued, the licensee is given an opportunity to respond, and unresolved matters can proceed to the City Council for license revocation. Staff said it would be unusual for the airport board itself to take direct enforcement action, but the board may recommend that the recorder pursue administrative remedies.
The presenter moved that the city "ferret out" noise-abatement policy violations in the last 30 days and take action against business-license holders; the motion failed for lack of a second. Board members then read and discussed the text of the noise-abatement policy. One board member noted the policy is voluntary because a federal law passed in 1990 limits local governments’ ability to make airport-noise rules binding unless grandfathered; operators confirmed the voluntary nature and said they aim to comply.
Operator response: a flight-school representative said the company trains instructors on the noise policy, will avoid student solo night flights, and remains committed to following the voluntary policy. Several board members emphasized the potential community impacts of repeat violations and recommended using existing administrative channels when appropriate.
Next steps: No formal enforcement action was approved by the board at the meeting; staff described the administrative process to lodge and pursue business-license violations through the city recorder.
