Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council seeks clarification after BLM asks to renew expired right-of-way applications
Summary
An email from the Bureau of Land Management flagged expired right-of-way renewals for an irrigation pond, pipeline and a spring-protection site; council members agreed to follow up with the BLM contact to determine whether town assets or the irrigation company are affected.
Council members reviewed correspondence from the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) indicating two right-of-way applications for an irrigation pond, pipeline and a spring-protection site had expired and asked the town to renew them as soon as possible. The town debated which features actually cross BLM land and who is responsible for renewal.
Members noted that the lower irrigation pond sits on private town ground near the tank and that the town's springs and several ponds are on private or other land, not BLM. At least one pipeline segment near the top of the hill was discussed as likely crossing BLM land; council members and staff committed to contacting the BLM representative (named Northcroft in the email) for clarification.
The council agreed to investigate which easements are affected, to determine whether renewals are the town's responsibility or belong to other water users (such as Fremont Irrigation), and to follow up with BLM to prevent lapse of necessary rights-of-way or permits.
Next steps: Staff will contact the BLM representative to clarify which right-of-way applications are expired, verify ownership/responsibility for the features named, and report findings to the council.
