Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Small Lot Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fern City planning panel forwards 365 N. 100 E. lot split to council with condition
Summary
Fern City Planning and Zoning voted Aug. 19 to forward a proposal to split 365 North 100 East to City Council, adding a condition that the newly created lot not be further subdivided; discussion focused on whether utilities and water shares meet the ordinance’s required-improvements standards.
Get email alerts on the Small Lot Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fern City Planning and Zoning voted on Aug. 19 to forward an application to subdivide 365 North 100 East to the City Council for final approval, adding a restriction that the newly created lot may not be split again.
The commissioners considered whether the new city subdivision ordinance (Title 11) and its expedited small-lot process apply to the parcel and whether the property meets the ordinance’s required-improvements standard. The ordinance language cited in the meeting (Title 11 and a provision referenced as a required-improvements clause) lists utilities and street infrastructure — including water, sewer, telephone, cable, gas, electricity, gutters, sidewalks, surfacing, stormwater measures, hydrants and street lights — among items that must be available before a final plat is recorded.
Planning participants said utilities are adjacent to the property — a power pole on the east and a transformer at a corner — but disagreed on whether proximity is sufficient or whether services must be stubbed to the lot. One participant summarized the practical effect: the parcel currently holds one water share for the house, and an additional water share will be needed before a separate lot can be developed. An owner or agent present said they plan to turn additional shares and install culinary water when a building permit is sought.
Members also reviewed the parcel’s history: the property has been divided and recombined several times, and the commission noted the potential of creating a nonconforming lot if the split is recorded without meeting the ordinance’s improvement requirements. The owner noted an existing easement for geothermal infrastructure on the north portion of the property that prevents building in the first roughly 40 feet of the north lot.
A motion to forward the subdivision application to the City Council ‘‘for approval, with the condition that the lot not be further split’’ was recorded as made by Commissioner Clausen and seconded by Commissioner Harvey. The planning body voted by voice and the motion carried; the commission also confirmed that the ordinance’s review committee process and a design-review step will apply. An identified planning official said the review committee will handle interpretation questions before recordation.
The application will go to City Council for the final decision; planning staff and the review committee are expected to clarify whether utilities must be stubbed to the lot or whether proximity to existing services satisfies the ordinance before the council acts.
