Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves preliminary subdivision at 75 E 1800 S after residents raise water and fencing concerns
Summary
The commission approved the 7‑acre preliminary subdivision at 75 East 1800 South, with staff conditions that remaining engineering (grading, stormwater, utilities, and fencing) be completed in the engineering application; multiple residents voiced concerns about water pressure and canal fencing.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Approval topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Perry City Planning Commission voted to approve a preliminary subdivision application for the 75 East 1800 South parcel (about 7 acres, zoned R‑1), contingent on completion of engineering requirements for grading, stormwater, utilities and fencing during the final engineering application.
City planner Bob Barnhart presented the plan, saying water and sewer are available and that the developer proposes a stub road connection to existing streets. Barnhart said the city engineer modeled the proposed water main and estimated service pressures of "50 to 60 PSI with this new water main going through." He also described a preliminary stormwater proposal that could use an underground stormwater facility on one lot and explained adjustments made to utilities to avoid overly deep sewer or storm lines.
Multiple residents spoke during public comment. Laurie Smith (Hill Haven) said, "I don't understand how adding more people or more houses will improve the water pressure," describing past interruptions and a private pump. Barnhart replied with a plain‑language explanation: "you lose pressure with every foot of pipe water has to travel through" and adding additional connections and a new main shortens flow paths and reduces friction loss, which should improve delivery pressure; he encouraged follow‑up with staff and noted hydrant flow testing is commonly used to verify fire‑flow and pressure.
Other commenters raised roadway alignment and fencing concerns. Marty Obray asked why the south access no longer lined up with Maple Hills Drive; staff said the city preferred alignment but the adjacent property owner would not provide right‑of‑way and the offset still met standards. Larry Fairfield said developer‑promised fencing near Pineview Reservoir had not been installed on earlier projects and described long‑standing pressure issues.
A commissioner moved to approve the preliminary subdivision "with the wording that Bob asked for" — that outstanding engineering and certification must be completed in the engineering application — the motion was seconded and approved by roll call. Staff emphasized that the preliminary application met applicable requirements and that remaining technical details will be reviewed administratively during engineering.
Next steps: Staff will inform the developer of outstanding technical items to resolve during engineering; residents were advised they may follow up with planning staff for additional details and test results.
