Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Setbacks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates solutions for underdeveloped areas where 20-foot setbacks hamper home additions
Summary
Council members discussed options — surveys, variances, street vacations, rezoning or lot-size-based setbacks — to address cases where historical lot lines and lack of curb/gutter/sidewalks make the city's 20-foot front setback onerous for homeowners in underdeveloped neighborhoods.
Beaver City council spent an extended discussion on differences between underdeveloped parts of town (defined as areas without curb, gutter or sidewalks) and developed neighborhoods where standard setbacks apply.
Council members and staff described cases where county parcel lines place property boundaries very close to existing porches, making the city’s 20-foot front setback effectively impossible for homeowners seeking additions. Staff and council discussed several options: advising homeowners to obtain a lot survey before applying for permits; pursuing variances (which speakers described as difficult to obtain and not always appropriate); vacating or narrowing streets (a process that can increase lot frontage but requires careful surveying and can have legal/utility implications); or creating a distinct zoning designation with setback standards tied to lot size.
Participants repeatedly cautioned that any change must comply with state law and apply equally across a zone. One idea that gained support was considering setback standards keyed to lot size so that homeowners with smaller lots have different setback requirements than owners of larger lots. Staff and planning and zoning were identified as the bodies to prepare formal recommendations.
No ordinance or variance change was approved at the meeting. The council directed staff to gather more information, consult planning and zoning, and advise homeowners to obtain surveys as a first step when permitting is sought.
