Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Access topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Landowner asks Rush Valley to open platted Cedar Road; town cites irrigation lines, wet soils and legal limits
Summary
A Park family member urged Rush Valley to use a platted town road (Cedar Road/Bracken Lane) to restore access to landlocked parcels; neighbors and the St. John Irrigation Company warned the corridor contains century-old fences and a major irrigation 'H' valve cluster, and the town attorney said the town may exercise but is not required to build the road.
Craig Park told the Rush Valley Town Council he and his family acquired three parcels in 1981 that he says were understood to be accessible via a platted town road (Cedar Road/Bracken Lane). "I would request that Rush Valley use that parcel as an actual road for access to to those parcels," Park said, asking the council to recognize the mapped road and restore access.
Multiple neighbors and irrigation representatives spoke at length. Glenna Matinko stated the fence down the center of the plotted road "has always been there" and opposed ripping it out; Kyle Russell, a director of the St. John Irrigation Company, said the irrigation system installed in the 1970s includes a major H‑shaped valve tie-in that sits in the road corridor and that the irrigation layout was designed as a gravity-fed system.
Town staff and council members reviewed plat maps and a percolation test that had been performed that morning. Several speakers described the meadow soils as seasonally soggy and said trucks and trailers cannot reliably access the parcels for up to half the year; one landowner noted FEMA flood-map constraints and concerns about septic systems in high water-table areas.
Town Attorney (speaker 14) told the council the town still has the legal ability to exercise the platted right-of-way but is not required to construct a road. "Nobody can force the town to build a road," the attorney said, and he expressed skepticism about a detrimental-reliance claim absent prior town action to develop the road.
Council discussion favored pursuing existing, already‑improved Pine Street access rather than requiring the town to remove fences and build across irrigation infrastructure and wet meadow soils. No formal motion to open or build the platted road was made; council directed staff to explore Pine Street options and consult with county FEMA/emergency-management staff and irrigation stakeholders.
Next steps: staff will investigate the Pine Street access route, consult irrigation officials about the valve infrastructure, and report back; petitioners and neighbors will remain in contact with the town for follow-up.
